Integration
01 / 06

Invisible integration.
Evidence ready for review.

V-PROOF integrates through APIs, events and connectors with the systems your organisation already uses (ERP, CRM, repositories, pipelines). The capture points and the evidence to be generated are defined during integration, and the evidence is ready for audits and regulatory requests.

Three steps, without interruptions
02 / 06
01
Connect to your systems

Via REST APIs or events from corporate systems: ERP, CRM, document repositories, AI pipelines, and existing cloud platforms.

02
Evidence capture

For the events you define—approval, release, decision, or publication— V-PROOF generates a cryptographic fingerprint and records the operational metadata. The original asset remains in your environment.

03
Verifiable evidence

The fingerprint and its time reference are linked to verifiable cryptographic evidence. Auditors and authorities can verify it without accessing internal systems.

It connects to what you already have
03 / 06

No need to replace platforms. No need to reconfigure workflows.

The evidence layer integrates with the existing architecture. These are the areas where it is used most frequently.

ERP / CRM

Evidence of decisions, approvals, configuration changes, and critical operational events.

AI Pipelines

Version control for models, datasets, validations, and human oversight in high-risk systems.

Document Management

Traceability of versions, publications, approvals, and document chain of custody.

ICT Infrastructure

Evidence of incidents, configuration changes, access, and operational continuity for DORA and NIS2.

Preventive evidence
04 / 06

During the process, not after the incident.

Regulatory Risk

When a check was run, who performed it, which version was affected, and what human intervention took place—all in a package that is sealed and verifiable by a third party.

Sensitive Information and Perimeter

With fingerprints calculated on-premises, the original assets stay within your perimeter. Only the cryptographic fingerprints and operational metadata defined by the organization are transmitted.

Corporate Governance and Business Continuity

A consistent chain of evidence improves the ability to reconstruct decisions, respond to audits, and manage incidents, and reduces investigation times.

Compared to other categories
05 / 06

What each type of tool offers.

Comparison based on purpose and technical capabilities within each category, not on specific products. Within the same category, some products offer more features than others.

Criterion V-PROOF GRC Platforms AI Detectors Electronic Signature
Technical Architecture
Verifiable cryptographic fingerprint
The asset stays within your perimeter
Time reference associated with verifiable evidence
AI governance
Human Oversight Record
Evidence applicable to the EU AI Act
Verifiable without access to internal systems
Integration
Integration via APIs and events
Without changing operational workflows
Typical capability Depending on the product or configuration Not its primary purpose Electronic evidence designed to be submitted as evidence in the EU (eIDAS, Articles 41 and 45(h)). It is neither a certificate of conformity nor a qualified seal.
Before integrating
06 / 06

What your technical and legal team is asking.

Technical What data leaves the corporate environment?

With fingerprints computed locally, the original assets remain within the perimeter: the cryptographic fingerprint is generated within the system. What is transmitted are fingerprints, identifiers, timestamps, and the operational metadata defined by the organization. The exact data flows are documented and validated prior to deployment.

Regulatory What evidentiary value does it have in the EU?

V-PROOF generates technical evidence with a cryptographic hash and a verifiable timeline, structured so that auditors and authorities can verify it without accessing internal systems. Its probative value depends on the associated identity, the reliability of the sources, and the chain of custody that is maintained. The decision on its admissibility rests with the competent authority.

Integration What does technical integration require?

Identify the assets, events, or decisions that should generate evidence; then define data capture points, metadata, identity sources, and access policies. The effort required depends on the number of systems and the available APIs. The assessment defines the scope and provides a roadmap with timelines and dependencies.

Integration Does this require changing current systems or providers?

There is no need to replace them. V-PROOF is an evidence layer that connects via APIs, events, or specific integrations to what already exists. Some deployments may require connectors or minor process changes; the assessment determines the actual scope. The design takes into account identity, directories, repositories, pipelines, management systems, cloud providers, and audit tools already in place.

Regulatory Is it mandatory to use an infrastructure such as V-PROOF?

The regulations do not prescribe specific technology; they require organizations to demonstrate controls, traceability, oversight, and risk management. V-PROOF provides a way to demonstrate it using evidence of controls generated within the workflow itself. The key question is: What risk does the organization assume if it cannot demonstrate what it is already doing?

Technical Technician How is the integrity of the evidence protected?

Each sealed event generates a cryptographic fingerprint associated with a timestamp and its context. Any subsequent alteration to the original asset produces a different fingerprint, which makes it possible to detect the change during verification without accessing internal systems.

Complex infrastructure?
Let's take a look at it together.

A 90-minute session with our solutions architects: technical and legal feasibility, integration roadmap including timelines, dependencies, data capture points, and metadata. Deliverable within five business days.

3,500 € · fixed price based on scope, no minimum contract term.

Technical and strategic assessment. This does not constitute legal advice.